8

The conclusion of Weapons of Math Destruction sums up the reading by explaining the intersectionality of WMDs and how they not only connect but work together to target marginalized groups into a cycle of oppression, oppression that feeds off of more oppression, where poverty only generates more issues around more poverty. It is as if the reading is arguing that WMDs were designed specially to keep the poor, poor and to make the poor even poorer than they are, WMDs profit from exploiting poor people and marginalized groups. Interestingly enough, the conclusion dives into how WMDs puppeteer society behind gentrified cities in the United States. Another interesting section in the conclusion deals with political agenda versus corporate power influence and how political issues can turn into trendy commodities in the world of commercialization. Cathy O’Neil introduces an interesting concept in the conclusion called “antipoverty strategies” and how some politicians victim blame the poor while promoting the idea of middle class. The idea of a middle-class is arguably nonexistent but it allows politicians to sell a distraction, a distraction from eradicating poverty but WMDs do not just discriminate, they manipulate the poor, they manipulate the so-called middle class, and they can manipulate rich. The conclusion continues, societal codependency on technology versus reimagining algorithm technologies and undoing WMDs through new ideas and regulation but the conclusion also discusses consumption of the products of modern slave labor. Cathy O’Neil’s afterword section deals with the wonky effects of feedback loops especially in polling for presidential elections she discusses briefly but she also introduces a term called “data quality” which is about accuracy and training algorithms. What is interesting about the conclusion and the afterword is that both contents deal with the overlapping layers of intersectionality and how weapons of math destruction creates inequality in society.